my head is about to explode with all the terminator cracks!

i cant believe there isn't ONE terminator joke in this whole article. i guess some people gots integrities.


The L.A. Times and the San Francisco Gate are reporting that Governor Schwarzenegger is using the budget crunch to renew a previous attempt to drastically shorten the holding period animals must be kept at government-funded shelters. According to the Times, “In 2004, Schwarzenegger made a similar proposal, saying cutting the minimum number of days shelters had to keep pets would save the state $14 million annually.”

Pushback from voters forced the Governor to shelve the plan, but despite the clear support demonstrated by Californians at that time for homeless, lost, and abandoned animals, once again he is attempting to use a financial crisis to eliminate hard-won laws that give pet owners the chance to find lost pets, and homeless animals even the briefest window of opportunity to find a home. According to SF Gate, “The proposal would allow shelters to euthanize stray pets after only three days, down from six.”

This isn’t the only time recently that the Governor has aimed the budget axe at the most voiceless (and vote-less?) in our society; in November of 2008 he proposed taxing veterinary care, classifying such lifesaving services as “luxuries,” in a category with golf, amusement parks, and sporting events.

Is the Governor betting that the financial situation has gotten so bad that Californians are now ready to throw lost and homeless dogs, cats, and other companion animals out of the lifeboat? Or can pushback from Californians once again remind him that in the state where he chose to run for Governor we really do care about animals? We are against cruelty and neglect, and we believe that (at the most selfish level) if our dog or cat becomes we lost, both we and our pet deserve a fair chance of finding each other before the cost of a bowl of food and some clean water become too financially burdensome for the state.

so..does 14 million sound like a lot to you? considering this state gives organizations such as planned parenthood around 300 million annually, i really don't think that's very much. and while i couldn't for the life me google my way to finding out the exact number of taxpayers in california, if you take roughly half the citizens of CA and divide that into 14 million, that's only about $0.80 per person per year.

i'd be willing to pay $0.80 per year to save millions of lucys. what about you?


sidenote: if you read the article here the caption under the photo i stole reads: 'Animals need time to find homes, especially seniors, larger dogs and both black dogs and cats.'

people are so racist.